Sunday, December 5, 2010

SCT 3rd Term Committee Final Report

Dear fellow neighbours and residents,

Attached are SCT 3rd Term Committee Final Reports:
1. Summary Report in English
2. Summary Report in Chinese
3. Financial Reports

thank you very much for your support.



1. Summary Report in English






2. Summary Report in Chinese





3. Financial Reports


Saturday, December 4, 2010

Official Complaint on SCT 1st Appointed Legal Firm For Overcharging To Advocates & Solicitors Disciplinary Board

SCT 3rd Term Committee has submitted an official Complaint an official complaint to Advocates & Solicitors Disciplinary Board on 22 Nov 2010.

Attached are the relevant documents:

1. Registration Form to Lodge the Complaint

2. Complaint Letter

3. Support Documents
a. Letters and Newspaper Cutting on MPSJ Surveying Works
b. Letter on terms of payment by SCT 1st Appointed Legal Firm dated 14 March 2006
(Appointed by SCT 1st Term Committee Leadership)
c. Letter provided by SCT 1st Appointed Legal Firm on breakdown of payment dated 22 Oct
2010

4. Receipt from Advocates & Solicitors Disciplinary Board for processing fee

Please note that court documents MT1-21-30-2006 and MT3-25-35-2006 is not attached because they are so thick. If you are interested to view the copy, please contact SCT 3rd Term Committee before 25 June 2011.


1. Registration Form to Lodge the Complaint






2. Complaint Letter








3. Support Documents
3(a). Letters and Newspaper Cutting on MPSJ Surveying Works




3(b). Letter on terms of payment by SCT 1st Appointed Legal Firm dated 14 March 2006 (Appointed by SCT 1st Term Committee Leadership)




3(c). Letter provided by SCT 1st Appointed Legal Firm on breakdown of payment dated 22 Oct 2010




4. Receipt from Advocates & Solicitors Disciplinary Board for processing fee

Thursday, September 30, 2010

News Report on 26 Sept 2010 Press Conference

News Report from The Star, Sin Chew, Nanyang, China Press and Malaysiakini





Malaysiakini (Komunitikini): Discrepancies in public funds

by Leven Woon on 27 Sep, 2010
Tagged:
in Announcements, Complaints, News, Property, Puchong.

Internal conflict is brewing among Saujana Puchong residents movement Signature Campaign Network (SCT) as the current committee found discrepancies in its financial accounts.

The NGO, which was formed to campaign against a cemetery project at the Ayer Hitam Forest Reserve, has to figure out the transactions of its public funds after legal firm T.J Chin & Co claimed that they have received more than the amount that was recorded to have been channeled for legal fees.

According to SCT secretary Ng Chee Kwang, the first term committee members had in 2006 paid T.J Chin & Co RM55,000 for legal service fees to bring the Selangor state government to court; but the firm claimed to have received RM65,000.

“If the required legal fees was just RM55,000, why the firm got an extra RM10,000? How come there is a discrepancy?” he asked.

The current committee, which is the third term committee, is now demanding the first term committee members to step forward and clarify to the residents regarding the funds.

“The first term chairman refused to help us sorting out the discrepancy. This had raised an issue of public accountability,” Ng said.

(front row from left) Ng, SCT current chairman Lee Wai Hong and committee member Lau Seng Yau

“Neither of it can make up RM80,000″

Ng added that during the SCT’s establishment in 2006, everyone was told that an amount of RM80,000 was raised through public donations as for operational and legal fees.

However, when the current members took over the leadership on September 2009, they found only RM27.82 was left in SCT’s bank account.

Through a series of records tracing, they later found out that RM15,000 was earmarked as a fixed deposit while RM12,500 was paid to another appointed legal firm in 2007.

“But the point is, neither RM55,000 nor RM65,000 plus the RM27,500 above could make up a RM80,000. So how much funds did we really raise in the first place?” Ng added.

The committee had issued three letters to T.J Chin & Co to request a breakdown of expenses on the purported amount ofRM65,000, to which the legal firm has yet to respond.

Hence, the members have appointed another lawyer at their own expenses to pursuit the request.

Lau: human greed most likely the reason

Committee member Lau Seng You expressed that human greed is most likely the reason behind these discrepancies.

He however promised that if SCT can get back its entitled funds, it will be donated to culture and education-based organizations.

“(The fund) came from the public somehow,” he said.


SCT dropped court case against Selangor government

Meanwhile, SCT is planning to dissolve its body by June next year as their six-year struggle had finally reached a happy ending.

Selangor exco Teresa Kok on July announced that the cemetery project on the Ayer Hitam Forest Reserve plot was shelved. Instead, the plot near to Saujana Puchong was officially gazetted as part of the forest reserve.

Following this, SCT had officially reached an out-of-court settlement with the Selangor government last Friday.

“We feel happy because after six years of struggle, all fellow residents can now enjoy peace of mind and start focusing on their future plans,” Lau said.

Map data ©2010 MapIT - Terms of Use
Map
Satellite
Hybrid
Terrain
2000 ft
1 km